Good Sam Club Open Roads Forum: Class C Motorhomes: Cabcover vs. Non-Cabcover
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Help and Support  |  Contact

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Class C Motorhomes

Open Roads Forum  >  Class C Motorhomes

 > Cabcover vs. Non-Cabcover

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 2  
Prev
joe b.

Florida

Senior Member

Joined: 08/24/2002

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 04/17/12 06:57am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

We are considering adding a Class C, again. The last one we had, was a 25 ft. bunk model with a cab over, which was about the average size then. Now I notice that the average size, seems to have gone to about 30/31 ft with a bed in the back at floor level. Not having a cab over bed, to crawl into is looking better to me as I get older. (now 70)
A person(s) needs to take a realistic view on how they are going to use any RV and how many people will be using it, most of the time. Originally Class Cs were seen as starter units for young families and had sleeping room for most of the neighborhood. LOL Now many are being built that appear to be targeted toward the more middle age/senior couples and the prices/accommodations reflect that usage.
While a front entertainment center, would be nice when just my wife and I are traveling, it would be a problem when our adult daughter and her two sons, 7 and 9 year olds, are with us. We tend to average about 150 nights a year out in one of our RVs. About 100 in our truck camper with a cab over, and 50 nights in our bunk model 5th wheel. Same truck used for both.
On a long trip it can get to be a hassle to turn the dinette table into a bed each night and then put it up the next morning. Especially if the person using it wants to sleep in a bit, while others are wanting to eat breakfast on the same table. LOL With us having 3 extra people with us, about 1/5 of the time, (30 nights a year avg.) I feel it has to be considered when we purchase a rig.
If we go ahead and purchase a Class C, it will probably be a super C model with a bed in the back, bunk beds and a cab over bed, leaving the living area for living in.


joe b.
Stuart Florida
Formerly of Colorado and Alaska
Chevy 3500 DRW Dmax CC - Rockwood 8281 SS 5th Whl & 2008 Lance 845 TC
www.pajbcooper.com web site
Alaska Trip 2011 posted
Colo-Utah-Ariz 2012 trip posted
"Without challenge, adventure is impossible".

ShamRockerBob

N. Georgia

New Member

Joined: 02/10/2011

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 04/17/12 07:37am Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Thanks for all the information. With 7 grandkids I'd better go with the extra sleeping area. (not all 7 at one time, of course). The more aerodynamic configuration probably wouldn't make that much difference in the MPG. Now all I have to do is wait and see who the next President is going to be before I make my decision to buy. But that's another topic. Thanks again for the responses.

Bob in Georgia


2011 Shamrock 21SS
2010 F-150 Lariat


Robocop

Baltimore

Senior Member

Joined: 02/11/2006

View Profile



Good Sam RV Club Member

Offline
Posted: 04/19/12 05:58pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I bought my C knowing full well my sons would no longer be regularly going with me and I do not have a line at the door of folks who want to go. However, my desire was to have more sleeping/storage/living space than I would need for myself. I love having a queen bed cabover with a fiberglass cap and no front window.


Scott

2011 Sunseeker 3170DSF
2 great sons, Scott & Alex (23 & 20)
"Courage is the thing. All goes if courage goes."


paullac

Cincinnati, OH

Senior Member

Joined: 03/27/2004

View Profile



Posted: 04/19/12 07:51pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

ron.dittmer wrote:

Every class C cabover bed with seamwork in that area is susceptible to water leaks. If I really needed that extra bed, I would get a seamless bucket design. New seamless ones are very hard to find on the large Ford versions, but the smaller Sprinter versions are readily available.

If you don't need that extra bed, then I strongly advise to consider a B+ as they are both seamless and aerodynamic offering improved handling as well as fuel economy. They are quite nice inside as well, offering storage and entertainment along with providing a nicer more open living area.

If you intend to take full advantage of the massive storage a conventional class C cab-over offers, you are at risk of over-loading it with too much weight which will further encourage seams to split.

I imagine it would be heartbreaking to find water and mold damage inside a motor home. This is the time of year for owners to head out to their storage lot and discover their wonderful class-C has been leaking all winter long. I don't know the percentage of failed seams, but I would not risk it if I did not need that bed in the first place.

Here is an example of a hard-to-find Ford chassis seamless cab-over bed.
This is ideal.


Here is the same brand motor home, but with cab-over seamwork.
This type of seamwork is not as bad as some.


This design is most susceptible to water penetration.
Again, the same brand motor home.


I am not picking on Tioga here. Actually I commend them for offering a seamless cab-over model. Most companies do not.



Ron - I can't figure out where you got the top picture, or at least what model year that is. I went to fleetwoodrv.com, searched on class c gas, looked at all the models (including Tioga), & they all have seams on the side of the cabover similar to the middle picture. They're showing 2012 model year on their website. Wondering if it's an earlier model year camper & Fleetwood has since added cabover seams back because it's cheaper.


'13 Forest River Sunseeker 3100
'04 Fleetwood Sedona / Reese Mini 350 / Prodigy / BAL
'94 Coleman Cedar

ron.dittmer

Northern Illinois

Senior Member

Joined: 02/26/2007

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 04/19/12 08:38pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Paul, I wonder if you are correct. That 1st seamless pic was of a used 2008 or 09 model. I don't know who makes a new class-C seamless cap on the Ford anymore. It was a great idea, maybe no longer available.


2007 Phoenix Cruiser model 2350, with 2006 Jeep Liberty in-tow


mlts22

Austin, Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 11/15/2010

View Profile



Posted: 04/20/12 04:07pm Link  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

ron.dittmer wrote:

Paul, I wonder if you are correct. That 1st seamless pic was of a used 2008 or 09 model. I don't know who makes a new class-C seamless cap on the Ford anymore. It was a great idea, maybe no longer available.


I wish an OEM would make more of the one piece caps... just the fact that is cures so many problems that RV makers have with customer complaints over would likely make it worth the added expense.

Maybe if it were done right with plastic welding and a Lexan (polycarbonate) front window, we could see RVs on the road with the nice view over the cab... and zero leak issues.

This Topic Is Closed  |  Print Topic  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 2  
Prev

Open Roads Forum  >  Class C Motorhomes

 > Cabcover vs. Non-Cabcover
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Class C Motorhomes


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:

© 2013 Good Sam Club | Terms & Conditions | PRIVACY POLICY | YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS