mavapa

Rome, Ga, USA

Senior Member

Joined: 11/08/2002

View Profile

|
kottfam6wi, where did you get the figure of 20 percent? According to the latest issue of Motorhome magazine, the urea injection diesel engine makers are using to meet the latest EPA regulations, the same technology they have been using to meet European regulations for many, many miles, actually allows the engines to gain back some of the mileage they lost using older, exhaust recirculation technology to meet earlier standards.
As to an ulterior motive by politicians, I don't want to get into a political discussion.
|
kottfam6wi

South Central Wisconsin

Senior Member

Joined: 03/16/2005

View Profile

Offline
|
mavapa wrote: kottfam6wi, where did you get the figure of 20 percent? According to the latest issue of Motorhome magazine, the urea injection diesel engine makers are using to meet the latest EPA regulations, the same technology they have been using to meet European regulations for many, many miles, actually allows the engines to gain back some of the mileage they lost using older, exhaust recirculation technology to meet earlier standards.
As to an ulterior motive by politicians, I don't want to get into a political discussion.
My info came straight from a MB engineer. I use Sprinter vans for my business and had the opportunity to be at the dealership when Mercedes had some of their reps there. The discussion about the smart car came up and was quite interesting. He said 20% was actually being generous.
Joe
Our Family Pictures
Joe
Chris-9, Emily-5, Jessica-3, Jason-2
"Rallies Attended 9 1/2" (Wahoo!! we're catching up!)
2005 Dodge Ram 2500 Quad Cab 5.9L CTD
2005 K-Z Durango 315BH 5th Wheel (2nd Camper)
|
rehoppe

Denver

New Member

Joined: 01/30/2009

View Profile

Offline
|
kottfam6wi wrote: Seems kinda stupid to ban a vehicle that gets 88 mpg, but that's the US for you. Really makes you wonder what their real motive is 
That an easy one. Just look for the disclaimer 'Paid for by the Petroleum Industry'
|
|
|
|