Good Sam Club Open Roads Forum: Tow Vehicles: 2017 F-150HD or F-250?
Open Roads Forum Already a member? Login here.   If not, Register Today!  |  Help

Newest  |  Active  |  Popular  |  RVing FAQ Forum Rules  |  Forum Posting Help and Support  |  Contact  

Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > 2017 F-150HD or F-250?

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 20  
Prev
transamz9

Lawrenceburg Ky

Senior Member

Joined: 07/27/2010

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/11/18 04:19am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

I'd like to see how the HDPP would stack up against a regular cab 2wd 6.2 or 6.4 250/2500 as far as quickness, towing and fuel efficiency.


2016 Ram 3500 Mega Cab Limited/2013 Ram 3500 SRW Cummins(sold)/2005 RAM 2500 Cummins/2011 Sandpiper 345 RET (sold) 2015 Sanibel 3601/2008 Nitro Z9 Mercury 250 PRO XS the best motor made.

FishOnOne

The Great State of Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 02/12/2011

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/11/18 05:56am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

transamz9 wrote:

I'd like to see how the HDPP would stack up against a regular cab 2wd 6.2 or 6.4 250/2500 as far as quickness, towing and fuel efficiency.


The Ecoboost will outperform both 6.2/6.4 plain and simple


'12 Ford Super Duty FX4 ELD CC 6.7 PSD 400HP 800ft/lbs
"Built Ford Tough"
'16 Sprinter 319MKS "Wide Body"

harmanrk

Michigan

Full Member

Joined: 05/12/2013

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/11/18 06:28am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

FishOnOne wrote:

transamz9 wrote:

I'd like to see how the HDPP would stack up against a regular cab 2wd 6.2 or 6.4 250/2500 as far as quickness, towing and fuel efficiency.


The Ecoboost will outperform both 6.2/6.4 plain and simple


Quickness, Towing power, unloaded fuel eff., yes. Towing Fuel eff. would be a toss up.

Payload, is would come up significantly short.

Throw the Diesels for those 250/2500's into the mix (And lets face it, price point that's where the HDPP comes in), and the 150 will come up short in most. Quickness, (60 -80 to pull out an make a pass) I don't think those who praise the Eco, have experienced unleashing 900+ torques. Unloaded fuel eff., is probably pretty close in normal driving, with the periodic regens of the filter pulling the diesels numbers down to give an advantage to the Eco, but loaded, the Eco is not even going to come close. As for payload, the 250 with the diesel, and the 150 HDPP are neck and neck (2300-2400).

One common item I keep seeing brought up is the unloaded ride quality. Yes, its subjective, but two truck with nearly equal payloads, are going to react very similar over bumps in the road.

As for the hitch capability, it was said the HDPP is good for a tongue weight of 1300 (I assume this is its WD rating) the 250 with the heavy tow package is good for 2100 (Both carrying and WD).

* This post was edited 07/11/18 06:55am by harmanrk *


2017 Ford F250 CC-SB SRW PSD
2013 Solaire 190x


IdaD

Idaho

Senior Member

Joined: 08/06/2014

View Profile



Posted: 07/11/18 07:52am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

harmanrk wrote:

FishOnOne wrote:

transamz9 wrote:

I'd like to see how the HDPP would stack up against a regular cab 2wd 6.2 or 6.4 250/2500 as far as quickness, towing and fuel efficiency.


The Ecoboost will outperform both 6.2/6.4 plain and simple


Quickness, Towing power, unloaded fuel eff., yes. Towing Fuel eff. would be a toss up.

Payload, is would come up significantly short.

Throw the Diesels for those 250/2500's into the mix (And lets face it, price point that's where the HDPP comes in), and the 150 will come up short in most. Quickness, (60 -80 to pull out an make a pass) I don't think those who praise the Eco, have experienced unleashing 900+ torques. Unloaded fuel eff., is probably pretty close in normal driving, with the periodic regens of the filter pulling the diesels numbers down to give an advantage to the Eco, but loaded, the Eco is not even going to come close. As for payload, the 250 with the diesel, and the 150 HDPP are neck and neck (2300-2400).

One common item I keep seeing brought up is the unloaded ride quality. Yes, its subjective, but two truck with nearly equal payloads, are going to react very similar over bumps in the road.


The payload ratings are close on paper but if you look at axle ratings there's a pretty wide gap, and that's a lot more reflective of the diesel 250's actual payload capability. Ride quality will suffer accordingly on the 250 compared to the HDPP 150, but load carrying capability will be a lot better. I think the 250/SRW350 is a lot better value than any 150 these days in terms of what you get for the basically the same money.


2015 Cummins Ram 4wd CC/SB


troubledwaters

Potomac

Senior Member

Joined: 02/17/2017

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/11/18 10:50am Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

IdaD wrote:

...I think the 250/SRW350 is a lot better value than any 150 these days in terms of what you get for the basically the same money.
And I think you're wrong!
I would go for the F150 HDPP any day of the week and twice on Sunday. Now if they put the 3.5 Ecoboost and 10 spd transmission in the F250, I might change my mind. Until then, as a DD and some times Tow Vehicle, the 3.5L Ecoboost & 10 spd trans is a winning combination.

Maury82

Ohio

Full Member

Joined: 07/16/2017

View Profile



Posted: 07/11/18 01:25pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

IdaD wrote:

harmanrk wrote:

FishOnOne wrote:

transamz9 wrote:

I'd like to see how the HDPP would stack up against a regular cab 2wd 6.2 or 6.4 250/2500 as far as quickness, towing and fuel efficiency.


The Ecoboost will outperform both 6.2/6.4 plain and simple


Quickness, Towing power, unloaded fuel eff., yes. Towing Fuel eff. would be a toss up.

Payload, is would come up significantly short.

Throw the Diesels for those 250/2500's into the mix (And lets face it, price point that's where the HDPP comes in), and the 150 will come up short in most. Quickness, (60 -80 to pull out an make a pass) I don't think those who praise the Eco, have experienced unleashing 900+ torques. Unloaded fuel eff., is probably pretty close in normal driving, with the periodic regens of the filter pulling the diesels numbers down to give an advantage to the Eco, but loaded, the Eco is not even going to come close. As for payload, the 250 with the diesel, and the 150 HDPP are neck and neck (2300-2400).

One common item I keep seeing brought up is the unloaded ride quality. Yes, its subjective, but two truck with nearly equal payloads, are going to react very similar over bumps in the road.

I think the 250/SRW350 is a lot better value than any 150 these days in terms of what you get for the basically the same money.


You forgot to say, "for me".

I purchased the trailer I wanted without having the slightest clue what truck I needed to tow it.

I initially researched the Silverado, and then the Tundra, then Ford, and after doing the math, I eliminating all three, I was resigned on the 3/4 ton, and after renting the F250, I was a bit saddened that I had to get one.

It towed well, but that thing was not anything I wanted to drive when not towing, and I would have sat that thing in the yard beside the trailer.

I discovered that Ford had a heavy a duty payload package, and after researching, that was the only truck I wouldn't mind having, because it has other attributes I can deal with when not towing, and I might be able to park it in my driveway instead of the backyard when not towing.

After I let out some of the high 48 psi air the dealer had put in the tires, the truck rides pretty nice, along with the quietness, I can tolerate driving it.

It's the quickness that put this thing over the hump for me, but whenever I'm driving it, I always wish I was driving my car...my Accord V6 manual is quicker and much more agile.

A F250/350 dually diesel Limited would be just another one trick pony for me, and the value the HDPP 150 adds to both personal use and towing, a F250/350 (regardless the trim or engine) can't come close...

The value of a vehicle is determined by the individual, so you can only speak for how it applies to you.

IdaD

Idaho

Senior Member

Joined: 08/06/2014

View Profile



Posted: 07/11/18 01:49pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Maury82 wrote:

IdaD wrote:

harmanrk wrote:

FishOnOne wrote:

transamz9 wrote:

I'd like to see how the HDPP would stack up against a regular cab 2wd 6.2 or 6.4 250/2500 as far as quickness, towing and fuel efficiency.


The Ecoboost will outperform both 6.2/6.4 plain and simple


Quickness, Towing power, unloaded fuel eff., yes. Towing Fuel eff. would be a toss up.

Payload, is would come up significantly short.

Throw the Diesels for those 250/2500's into the mix (And lets face it, price point that's where the HDPP comes in), and the 150 will come up short in most. Quickness, (60 -80 to pull out an make a pass) I don't think those who praise the Eco, have experienced unleashing 900+ torques. Unloaded fuel eff., is probably pretty close in normal driving, with the periodic regens of the filter pulling the diesels numbers down to give an advantage to the Eco, but loaded, the Eco is not even going to come close. As for payload, the 250 with the diesel, and the 150 HDPP are neck and neck (2300-2400).

One common item I keep seeing brought up is the unloaded ride quality. Yes, its subjective, but two truck with nearly equal payloads, are going to react very similar over bumps in the road.

I think the 250/SRW350 is a lot better value than any 150 these days in terms of what you get for the basically the same money.


You forgot to say, "for me".

I purchased the trailer I wanted without having the slightest clue what truck I needed to tow it.

I initially researched the Silverado, and then the Tundra, then Ford, and after doing the math, I eliminating all three, I was resigned on the 3/4 ton, and after renting the F250, I was a bit saddened that I had to get one.

It towed well, but that thing was not anything I wanted to drive when not towing, and I would have sat that thing in the yard beside the trailer.

I discovered that Ford had a heavy a duty payload package, and after researching, that was the only truck I wouldn't mind having, because it has other attributes I can deal with when not towing, and I might be able to park it in my driveway instead of the backyard when not towing.

After I let out some of the high 48 psi air the dealer had put in the tires, the truck rides pretty nice, along with the quietness, I can tolerate driving it.

It's the quickness that put this thing over the hump for me, but whenever I'm driving it, I always wish I was driving my car...my Accord V6 manual is quicker and much more agile.

A F250/350 dually diesel Limited would be just another one trick pony for me, and the value the HDPP 150 adds to both personal use and towing, a F250/350 (regardless the trim or engine) can't come close...

The value of a vehicle is determined by the individual, so you can only speak for how it applies to you.


"For me" is built into the "I think" that preceded my statement. Of course these determinations are subjective choices made by individuals. That's why some are happy towing with SUVs or midsize trucks, some like half tons, some like SRW HD and some like DRW HD (and up from there). SRW HD is my sweet spot because I feel like the only material compromise I'm making versus a half ton is a bit stiffer ride, and I can live with that just fine on a daily basis. A DRW HD is more than I want to deal with in a daily driver and family vehicle, and I'm happy enough with the more limited load carrying capability of my SRW HD.

Grit dog

Black Diamond, WA

Senior Member

Joined: 05/06/2013

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/11/18 02:53pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

^ There's an arse for every seat my grandpa used to say!


03 Arctic Fox 860
07 Dodge 2500 deezul

FishOnOne

The Great State of Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 02/12/2011

View Profile


Offline
Posted: 07/11/18 08:58pm Link  |  Quote  |  Print  |  Notify Moderator

Grit dog wrote:

^ There's an arse for every seat my grandpa used to say!


LMAO... No pun intended!

Reply to Topic  |  Subscribe  |  Print Page  |  Post New Topic  | 
Page of 20  
Prev

Open Roads Forum  >  Tow Vehicles

 > 2017 F-150HD or F-250?
Search:   Advanced Search

Search only in Tow Vehicles


New posts No new posts
Closed, new posts Closed, no new posts
Moved, new posts Moved, no new posts

Adjust text size:

© 2018 CWI, Inc. © 2018 Good Sam Enterprises, LLC. All Rights Reserved. | Terms of Use | PRIVACY POLICY | YOUR PRIVACY RIGHTS