โAug-06-2018 05:46 AM
โAug-11-2018 11:18 AM
westernrvparkowner wrote:Mr.Beebo wrote:It absolutely lowers values. I am always looking at investment properties and if the neighborhood is full of junk I pass, regardless of the condition of the actual property. Pretty impossible to write laws that allow a pristine custom Prevost coach, yet excludes the rusty schoolie covered with a tarp the guy is going to refurbish as soon as his hunch-backed brother straightens up.RTCastillo wrote:
First it is unsightly and lowers the value of the properties in the area (ask those who looks into buying new homes, an RV parked anywhere is to them sign of lax ordinance or HOA regulation implementation.
Some also let their RV as extra living room and this causes sanitary and fire hazards.
.
Now that is a whole lot of presumption.
A 1966 Terry sunk into the mud and covered in mold may be unsightly; not sure how a late model maintained RV on a pad lowers property values.
"Letting" or renting out your RV may be more common in California, but not common at all most anyplace else. How are sanitation and fire hazards an issue when a camper is occupied?
โAug-11-2018 10:38 AM
westernrvparkowner wrote:
You would make a great defense attorney. Just have you client tell the jury "I am not guilty of murder. Yes, I shot the guy, but he bled to death by himself."
โAug-11-2018 04:30 AM
Jay Coe wrote:
Shhhh... I was just trying to make him feel dumb without the dreaded "personal attack"
โAug-10-2018 06:55 PM
โAug-10-2018 10:06 AM
Jay Coe wrote:Ralph Cramden wrote:Bobbo wrote:
The crux is whether the word "motor" is in the ordinance referring specifically to recreational vehicles. You have now posted the ordinance WITH the word "motor," and WITHOUT the word "motor." If the ordinance does NOT have the word "motor" referring to recreational vehicles, you are out of luck.
"motor vehicle"for all intensive purposes.
Bwahahahaha! I saw a TV show where someone got called out for saying that but I didn't think any "real" people thought that's what it is!
It's "for all INTENTS AND PURPOSES"!
โAug-09-2018 07:34 PM
โAug-09-2018 07:37 AM
โAug-08-2018 04:34 PM
Ralph Cramden wrote:Bobbo wrote:
The crux is whether the word "motor" is in the ordinance referring specifically to recreational vehicles. You have now posted the ordinance WITH the word "motor," and WITHOUT the word "motor." If the ordinance does NOT have the word "motor" referring to recreational vehicles, you are out of luck.
"motor vehicle"for all intensive purposes.
โAug-08-2018 08:51 AM
โAug-08-2018 07:20 AM
westernrvparkowner wrote:Mr.Beebo wrote:It absolutely lowers values. I am always looking at investment properties and if the neighborhood is full of junk I pass, regardless of the condition of the actual property. Pretty impossible to write laws that allow a pristine custom Prevost coach, yet excludes the rusty schoolie covered with a tarp the guy is going to refurbish as soon as his hunch-backed brother straightens up.RTCastillo wrote:
First it is unsightly and lowers the value of the properties in the area (ask those who looks into buying new homes, an RV parked anywhere is to them sign of lax ordinance or HOA regulation implementation.
Some also let their RV as extra living room and this causes sanitary and fire hazards.
.
Now that is a whole lot of presumption.
A 1966 Terry sunk into the mud and covered in mold may be unsightly; not sure how a late model maintained RV on a pad lowers property values.
"Letting" or renting out your RV may be more common in California, but not common at all most anyplace else. How are sanitation and fire hazards an issue when a camper is occupied?
โAug-08-2018 06:16 AM
Mr.Beebo wrote:It absolutely lowers values. I am always looking at investment properties and if the neighborhood is full of junk I pass, regardless of the condition of the actual property. Pretty impossible to write laws that allow a pristine custom Prevost coach, yet excludes the rusty schoolie covered with a tarp the guy is going to refurbish as soon as his hunch-backed brother straightens up.RTCastillo wrote:
First it is unsightly and lowers the value of the properties in the area (ask those who looks into buying new homes, an RV parked anywhere is to them sign of lax ordinance or HOA regulation implementation.
Some also let their RV as extra living room and this causes sanitary and fire hazards.
.
Now that is a whole lot of presumption.
A 1966 Terry sunk into the mud and covered in mold may be unsightly; not sure how a late model maintained RV on a pad lowers property values.
"Letting" or renting out your RV may be more common in California, but not common at all most anyplace else. How are sanitation and fire hazards an issue when a camper is occupied?
โAug-08-2018 05:59 AM
RTCastillo wrote:
First it is unsightly and lowers the value of the properties in the area (ask those who looks into buying new homes, an RV parked anywhere is to them sign of lax ordinance or HOA regulation implementation.
Some also let their RV as extra living room and this causes sanitary and fire hazards.
.
โAug-08-2018 03:47 AM
โAug-07-2018 03:39 PM
mobeewan wrote:
Bumper tow ain't got no motor. Stop reading into it what it doesn't say just because what you think it "might" mean.