โJan-02-2019 02:21 PM
โJan-08-2019 03:03 PM
steved28 wrote:wanderingaimlessly wrote:
It also depends on the year.
1999=============305 hp, 4250 rpms Tor 420 @ 2650
2000-2004========310 hp, 4250 prms Tor 425 @ 3250
2005- present ===362 hp, 4750 rpms Tor 457 @ 3250
Tranny and gearing has also changed over the years.
This is not correct for the F-53 Motorhome chassis. The V10 is advertised as 320HP and 460ft/lbs. I beleive there is a 362HP version of the V10, but not for motorhome use.
โJan-08-2019 12:59 PM
steved28 wrote:wanderingaimlessly wrote:
It also depends on the year.
1999=============305 hp, 4250 rpms Tor 420 @ 2650
2000-2004========310 hp, 4250 prms Tor 425 @ 3250
2005- present ===362 hp, 4750 rpms Tor 457 @ 3250
Tranny and gearing has also changed over the years.
This is not correct for the F-53 Motorhome chassis. The V10 is advertised as 320HP and 460ft/lbs. I believe there is a 362HP version of the V10, but not for motorhome use.
โJan-08-2019 11:46 AM
wanderingaimlessly wrote:
It also depends on the year.
1999=============305 hp, 4250 rpms Tor 420 @ 2650
2000-2004========310 hp, 4250 prms Tor 425 @ 3250
2005- present ===362 hp, 4750 rpms Tor 457 @ 3250
Tranny and gearing has also changed over the years.
โJan-08-2019 11:24 AM
irishtom29 wrote:
My experience with a 2016 34โ Tiffin gasser is that it handles fine.
โJan-06-2019 04:01 PM
wa8yxm wrote:
One thing. well really 3. that people forget when talking about engines is the transmission. gear splitter (Optional) and Differential.
A flat four can get your RV up the hill.. VERY VERY SLOWLY given the proper gear ratios... It's not HP but torque at the rear axle that gets you up the hill
HP does it FASTER is all.
I drive a 37'7" clalss A with the Chevy V-8. HP and Torque wise so close to the Ford V-10 as to call 'em the same (Chevy had a bit more HP as I recall and a lower RPM for peak HP and Peak Torque giving it a slight advantage.
But I often pass semi's going up hill.. IT's all about the gear ratio not the HP.
โJan-06-2019 12:37 PM
irishtom29 wrote:mtofell1 wrote:
One thing I did learn from my research is an "out of the box" F53 chassis really rides and handles pretty poorly (especially compared to a DP, obviously). If/when I make the leap from my 5th wheel to a gasser I am budgeting a few thousand dollars for suspension upgrades and improvements.
My experience with a 2016 34โ Tiffin gasser is that it handles fine. This might be attributed to the 24,000 pound chassis (most coaches this size are on a 22,000 or less chassis) and the 228โ wheelbase, the longest in class. Anyway Iโm skeptical not only of claims of poor handling but also with the improvements people say they get with aftermarket devices, which people so often claim make a โnight and dayโ difference.
โJan-06-2019 11:43 AM
mtofell1 wrote:
One thing I did learn from my research is an "out of the box" F53 chassis really rides and handles pretty poorly (especially compared to a DP, obviously). If/when I make the leap from my 5th wheel to a gasser I am budgeting a few thousand dollars for suspension upgrades and improvements.
โJan-06-2019 10:23 AM
wanderingaimlessly wrote:
2005- present ===362 hp, 4750 rpms Tor 457 @ 3250
โJan-05-2019 02:05 PM
โJan-05-2019 07:23 AM
โJan-05-2019 05:21 AM
โJan-03-2019 04:43 PM
rr2254545 wrote:
I never heard of 40 ft gas unit ?? What brand
โJan-03-2019 03:40 PM
โJan-03-2019 02:18 PM