โJan-14-2020 08:11 AM
โJan-19-2020 03:46 PM
DarkSkySeeker wrote:
If I had a big array and one battery, the charge controller would limit the 50+ amps to perhaps 4 amps to the one battery?
โJan-17-2020 08:42 AM
โJan-16-2020 06:34 PM
โJan-16-2020 05:57 PM
โJan-16-2020 12:45 PM
MrWizard wrote:Obviously not. I assumed he meant 'during the course of charging' it would get to a point where the current was limited.
DOES your converter limit charge to 4 amps
DOES YOUR ALTERNATOR LIMIT CHARGE TO 4 AMPS
โJan-14-2020 08:59 PM
โJan-14-2020 02:21 PM
DarkSkySeeker wrote:2oldman wrote:
Yeah, that's why it's there.
So - here's a silly example.
If I had a big array and one battery, the charge controller would limit the 50+ amps to perhaps 4 amps to the one battery?
โJan-14-2020 12:45 PM
twodownzero wrote:My Outback controller doesn't ask how big the array is, but it does ask for the battery bank size in ah.
My controller knows how large my array is and what kind of batteries (conventional lead acid) are attached to it.
โJan-14-2020 11:09 AM
โJan-14-2020 09:10 AM
2oldman wrote:
The controller handles the current that's needed.
โJan-14-2020 09:03 AM
DarkSkySeeker wrote:That's what a decent controller is designed to do. As said above, they're just like any other charger.
If I had a big array and one battery, the charge controller would limit the 50+ amps to perhaps 4 amps to the one battery?
โJan-14-2020 08:52 AM
DarkSkySeeker wrote:Same way your 55 amp converter does not damage the battery or your 130 amp alternator does not burn out your vehicle battery.
I've read about solar charging systems, and am impressed when the owner boasts of the current generated. What I don't understand is how a system that generates 20-50+ amps doesn't fry the batteries. In these high current systems, is the charge being passed through a bank of batteries in parallel so each battery sees reasonable current?
โJan-14-2020 08:50 AM
โJan-14-2020 08:36 AM
2oldman wrote:
Yeah, that's why it's there.