cancel
Showing results forย 
Search instead forย 
Did you mean:ย 

2020 Ram 2500 Hemi 8 Speed vs the Ike Gauntlet

FishOnOne
Explorer III
Explorer III
For your viewing entertainment...

Link

Summary:

Ram 6.4
Trailer Weight: 14k lbs
Brake Applications: 14
Time: 10:29
Fuel Economy: 2.6 mpg

Ford 7.3
Trailer Weight: 16k lbs
Brake Applications: 9
Time: 8:42
Fuel Economy: 2.2 mpg

Chevy 6.6
Trailer Weight: 16k lbs
Brake Applications: 10
Time: 11:53
Fuel Economy: 2.4 mpg
'12 Ford Super Duty FX4 ELD CC 6.7 PSD 400HP 800ft/lbs "270k Miles"
'16 Sprinter 319MKS "Wide Body"
4 REPLIES 4

kw_00
Explorer
Explorer
It appears that GM needs to step up in transmission gearing.... they need to run that 10 speed. It will boost the capabilities of the new 6.6. Nice to see all that gas jobs though doing well.
A truck, a camper, a few toys, but most importantly a wonderful family.

ShinerBock
Explorer
Explorer
LanceRKeys wrote:
I was really wishing the ram would have done better. Too bad it wasnโ€™t a 4.10 rear pulling 16,000 like the other trucks.

Now I want to see the 6.2 with a 4.3 rear pulling that load up the hill.


I think the 7.3L Ford had a 4.30 in it.

I know many 6.4L owners in the Ram forum don't like the 3.73's, but that is what is mainly on the lots. The 4.10 guys generally have no complaints.
2014 Ram 2500 6.7L CTD
2016 BMW 2.0L diesel (work and back car)
2023 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon 3.0L Ecodiesel

Highland Ridge Silverstar 378RBS

MFL
Nomad II
Nomad II
Some impressive power from the Ford, compared to others. Takes a lot of fuel to make that power, in extreme test conditions. I think the new Ford 6.2 with 4.30 10-speed, which IIRC requires F350 for 10-speed, would not be too far behind 7.3 time, likely ahead of others.

Jerry

LanceRKeys
Explorer
Explorer
I was really wishing the ram would have done better. Too bad it wasnโ€™t a 4.10 rear pulling 16,000 like the other trucks.

Now I want to see the 6.2 with a 4.3 rear pulling that load up the hill.