deltabravo
Spokane, WA
Senior Member
Joined: 09/08/2003
View Profile
 Offline
|
woodworker414 wrote:deltabravo, thanks for the reply..... I already have a great truck.
No need to replace it.
Same here.
Mine has even fewer miles. It's got 69,xxx
2009 Silverado 3500HD Dually, D/A, CCLB 4x4 (bought new 8/30/09)
2009 Arctic Fox 811 (bought new 11/9/09)
2018 Timber Ridge 24RLS (bought pre-owned 3/12/20)
2008 Haulmark 8.5x20 toy box trailer
|
woodworker414
Crystal City,Mo.
Senior Member
Joined: 01/02/2004
View Profile
Offline
|
deltabravo, lot of miles left in your truck
Bill
WØWJU
Life is a trip, ENJOY the ride.
Safe Travels.
2015 Thor Motorcoach Chateau 31W
Toad: 2008 Chevy HHR
2015
|
Kayteg1
California > Nevada
Senior Member
Joined: 06/18/2015
View Profile
Offline
|
bwlyon wrote:Nothing less than a 1 ton dually will do for a triple slide host camper. If you’re looking for maximum payload a gas engine with a standard cab is the ticket, but a crew cab gasser will get you to 6k of payload. Even with a gasser you may be a little over 14k fully wet and ready to roll, consider yourself informed..
Very typical misinformation on this forum.
For truck camper you are using rear axle payload,so weigh of the engine makes no difference. Actually big camper will take load of front axle, so heavier engine is appreciated.
Than Crew Cabs take cargo capacity from rear axle.
|
d3500ram
Colorado
Senior Member
Joined: 07/31/2006
View Profile
|
woodworker414 wrote:...it would be the F450/556....
![[image]](https://i.imgur.com/qVMH5J8l.jpg,height=200)
![[emoticon]](https://forums.goodsamclub.com/sharedcontent/cfb/images/biggrin.gif "biggrin")
I know, I know... typo. But it caught my attention and this was the first thing that came to my mind this morning.
Not making fun, just wanting to share a funny meme that made my morning
|
jimh425
Western MT
Senior Member
Joined: 06/11/2006
View Profile
Offline
|
Kayteg1 wrote:bwlyon wrote:Nothing less than a 1 ton dually will do for a triple slide host camper. If you’re looking for maximum payload a gas engine with a standard cab is the ticket, but a crew cab gasser will get you to 6k of payload. Even with a gasser you may be a little over 14k fully wet and ready to roll, consider yourself informed..
Very typical misinformation on this forum.
For truck camper you are using rear axle payload,so weigh of the engine makes no difference. Actually big camper will take load of front axle, so heavier engine is appreciated.
Than Crew Cabs take cargo capacity from rear axle.
It’s not misinformation at all. It’s simple math. The GVWR is the same for most brands no matter what the truck weighs. Payload is is simply GVWR-weight of truck. If the truck weighs less as in regular cab/gasoline engine, the payload will be more.
If you are talking about what is the max load you could potentially carry on the rear axle, you are right that the front has nothing to do with it.
'10 Ford F-450, 6.4, 4.30, 4x4, 14,500 GVWR, '06 Host Rainer 950 Dbl Slide, Torklift Talon tiedowns, Glow Steps, and Fastguns. Bilstein 4600s, Firestone Air Bags, Hankook DH-01 225/19.5 Fs, Curt front hitch, Energy Suspension bump stops.
|
|
|
Kayteg1
California > Nevada
Senior Member
Joined: 06/18/2015
View Profile
Offline
|
Yeah, you are right Jim and not the first time you can't understand TC weight distribution. Straight math doesn't apply to TC. Would that info be on boat forum, there would be nothing wrong with it, but this is Truck Camper forum and such information is extremely misleading here.
I posted explanation above. Point what part you can't understand?
* This post was
edited 11/19/20 11:23am by Kayteg1 *
|
noteven
Turtle Island
Senior Member
Joined: 02/13/2011
View Profile
|
A Big Camper will only take weight off the steer axle if it’s horizontal Center of gravity (mass) is behind the rear axle.
Accurate math needs to be applied to weight distribution.
|
jimh425
Western MT
Senior Member
Joined: 06/11/2006
View Profile
Offline
|
Kayteg1 wrote:Point what part you can't understand?
Understand? That’s funny.
Just pointing out that what was posted was not at all misinformation. You simply think the actual definition of payload shouldn’t be considered. What you meant was “I don’t think GVWR matters, and only max axle ratings including tires matter.”
Your opinions don’t change the definitions of commonly accepted terms. It’s not misinformation because someone disagrees with what “you” would do.
And ... that’s silly to think that the definitions are different just because we own TCs.
|
woodworker414
Crystal City,Mo.
Senior Member
Joined: 01/02/2004
View Profile
Offline
|
d3500ram, funny, but I have a good excuse, I have lost 90/95% of my central vision from Macular Degeneration. I proof read everything I post but still miss some things
Yep funny, Maybe I should go for a Peterbilt.
Yep funny
|
d3500ram
Colorado
Senior Member
Joined: 07/31/2006
View Profile
|
I know it was a typo... It was just how it struck me this morning.
Simple things make this simple man laff at the most mundane things...
Besides... I like to lighten up these SERIOUS topics when neccesary...LOL.
|
|
|
