FishOnOne

The Great State of Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 02/12/2011

View Profile

Offline
|
So TFL tests the Rivian vs a Tundra on a tow test loop towing a 2,000lb trailer for 153 miles.
Results:
Rivian: Consumed 91% of battery capacity
Tundra: Consumed 32% of fuel tank capacity.
Add in the refuel and recharge time of these two trucks, the Tundra for any towing application is the clear winner hands down.
Link
'12 Ford Super Duty FX4 ELD CC 6.7 PSD 400HP 800ft/lbs
"250k Miles"
'16 Sprinter 319MKS "Wide Body"
|
pianotuna

Regina, SK, Canada

Senior Member

Joined: 12/18/2004

View Profile

Offline
|
cost of fuel was?
Regards, Don
My ride is a 28 foot Class C, 256 watts solar, 556 amp-hours of Telcom jars, 3000 watt Magnum hybrid inverter, Sola Basic Autoformer, Microair Easy Start.
|
bgum

South Louisiana

Senior Member

Joined: 02/22/2006

View Profile

Offline
|
I see no winner or looser. Without additional information as in fuel and maintenance cost you have reached a premature conclusion.
|
Lwiddis

Southern California :(

Senior Member

Joined: 08/12/2016

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
Offline
|
For reliability the horse was the clear winner in the horseless carriages’ early days.
Winnebago 2101DS TT & 2022 Chevy Silverado 1500 LTZ Z71, WindyNation 300 watt solar-Lossigy 200 AH Lithium battery. Prefer boondocking, USFS, COE, BLM, NPS, TVA, state camps. Bicyclist. 14 yr. Army -11B40 then 11A - (MOS 1542 & 1560) IOBC & IOAC grad
|
jdc1

Rescue, Ca

Senior Member

Joined: 05/30/2011

View Profile

Offline
|
EV's are in their infancy. By 2030, they will be outselling ICE vehicles easily. Solid state batteries will allow 1,000+ miles of driving without a recharge, and that recharge will take less than 10 minutes at 1/3 the cost of petroleum powered vehicles.
|
|
time2roll

Southern California

Senior Member

Joined: 03/21/2005

View Profile


Good Sam RV Club Member
|
Depends on the use. Could be a landscape trailer and only driven 120 miles in the day (or much less).
How well does that Tundra recharge the mandated no gasoline landscape tools between jobs?
There are so many applications of towing that does not include a 10 hour marathon.
2001 F150 SuperCrew
2006 Keystone Springdale 249FWBHLS
675w Solar pictures back up
|
CA Traveler

The Western States

Senior Member

Joined: 01/03/2004

View Profile

Offline
|
pianotuna wrote: cost of fuel was? For 153 miles the Tundra gas cost was $40.35. At $0.15/kWh the Rivian cost is $18.43.
I didn't see his actual electric cost. My house cost is $0.12/kWh and a recent CG charged $0.17/kWh.
2009 Holiday Rambler 42' Scepter with ISL 400 Cummins
750 Watts Solar Morningstar MPPT 60 Controller
2014 Grand Cherokee Overland
Bob
|
Reisender

NA

Senior Member

Joined: 12/09/2018

View Profile

Offline
|
CA Traveler wrote: pianotuna wrote: cost of fuel was? For 153 miles the Tundra gas cost was $40.35. At $0.15/kWh the Rivian cost is $18.43.
I didn't see his actual electric cost. My house cost is $0.12/kWh and a recent CG charged $0.17/kWh.
My personal experience is that DC fast charging costs typically 3 to 5 times the cost of charging at home...which is kinda why nobody charges at fast chargers unless they are on a road trip.
JMHO. Not an expert.
|
FishOnOne

The Great State of Texas

Senior Member

Joined: 02/12/2011

View Profile

Offline
|
jdc1 wrote: By 2030, they will be outselling ICE vehicles easily. Solid state batteries will allow 1,000+ miles of driving without a recharge, and that recharge will take less than 10 minutes
I seriously doubt that.
|
RetiredRealtorRick

St. Augustine Beach, FL

Senior Member

Joined: 04/17/2020

View Profile

|
The big difference, plain and simple, is that I can actually go out and BUY a Tundra. That being said, IMO, no contest who the winner is.
. . . never confuse education with intelligence, nor motion with progress
|
|