โSep-14-2017 12:14 PM
โSep-16-2017 05:57 AM
ncrowley wrote:
I would change the antenna. I have a dome Rayzar Automatic antenna and I really like it.
SoundGuy wrote:
Would like to ask - by any chance is your Winegard Rayzar Automatic a replacement for a Winegard Sensar IV and if so do you find it as sensitive as the IV as Winegard claims?
ncrowley wrote:
I cannot compare the two antennas since I have not used the two types of antennas in the same place and compared the signals. All I can tell you is that so far, it has found plenty of stations in the places we have used it and the picture quality is very good.
โSep-16-2017 04:47 AM
SoundGuy wrote:ncrowley wrote:
I would change the antenna. I have a dome Rayzar Automatic antenna and I really like it. I do not have the crank it up and down or position it once it is up.
Would like to ask - by any chance is your Winegard Rayzar Automatic a replacement for a Winegard Sensar IV and if so do you find it as sensitive as the IV as Winegard claims? Despite the Rayzar's substantial cost I'm interested, if for no other reason than it's annoying having to continually rotate my IV's head to receive stations transmitting from different directions.
โSep-15-2017 03:56 PM
spoon059 wrote:
I wish you could opt out of a TV antenna. I don't generally watch TV when camping anyways and would prefer to not have yet another protrusion into my roof.
โSep-15-2017 07:03 AM
โSep-15-2017 05:58 AM
ncrowley wrote:
I would change the antenna. I have a dome Rayzar Automatic antenna and I really like it. I do not have the crank it up and down or position it once it is up.
โSep-15-2017 05:44 AM
โSep-15-2017 05:40 AM
โSep-15-2017 04:20 AM
โSep-14-2017 08:18 PM
โSep-14-2017 06:59 PM
โSep-14-2017 06:33 PM
โSep-14-2017 02:13 PM
โSep-14-2017 02:07 PM
โSep-14-2017 12:59 PM