Sep-07-2019 06:12 AM
Sep-11-2019 01:31 PM
Bionic Man wrote:
So, what is the best way to lower EGTs?
Sep-11-2019 11:05 AM
allen8106 wrote:
A horse trailer advertisement disguised as a downhill towing comparison. JMHO.
Sep-11-2019 10:29 AM
Sep-10-2019 11:59 AM
Sep-10-2019 08:21 AM
Sep-10-2019 07:55 AM
Sep-09-2019 04:56 PM
Sep-09-2019 08:17 AM
4x4ord wrote:Me Again wrote:4x4ord wrote:
^^^^ Maybe. Anything I have driven with an engine brake had position 1 2 or 3 and was either off or on. No modulating.
Lots of RPMs left to be in 3rd and hold back a much larger load at 50MPH.
I don't know where the redline is on the 9l. On a larger diesel engine I wouldn't want to see it rev much over 2100 rpm. The loads I tow I seldom see the jake operating above 1800 rpm. If the Allison behind that 9l dropped to 3rd the engine would rev to 2800 rpm which might be ok?
Sep-09-2019 07:57 AM
4x4ord wrote:
The GM was not putting out anywhere near its advertised HP. A truck equipped with an engine making 445 hp / 910 lb ft would have been able to make that run in very close to 7 minutes 20 seconds. I think the high altitude must drastically affect the power these engines are able to make. If the Cummins was producing the power it is advertised to make it should have made the run in just over 9 minutes.
Sep-09-2019 06:21 AM
Me Again wrote:4x4ord wrote:
^^^^ Maybe. Anything I have driven with an engine brake had position 1 2 or 3 and was either off or on. No modulating.
Lots of RPMs left to be in 3rd and hold back a much larger load at 50MPH.
Sep-08-2019 04:19 PM
Cummins12V98 wrote:
They mentioned it was hot that day so why was the winter front on the M2?
Why use an older GMC for the test?
Sep-08-2019 03:56 PM
4x4ord wrote:
^^^^ Maybe. Anything I have driven with an engine brake had position 1 2 or 3 and was either off or on. No modulating.
Sep-08-2019 03:23 PM
Sep-08-2019 12:53 PM
4x4ord wrote:Me Again wrote:4x4ord wrote:
They praise the performance of the engine brake on the Freightliner over the performance of the exhaust brake on the GMC, however, if more weight had been loaded into the trailer the Duramax would have held 50 mph yet the Freightliner would have required additional brake applications. Comparing two trucks on one hill with only one weight in tow doesn't really offer an honest comparison. I'm having trouble understanding why the GM slowed down as much as it did going up the hill ..... something doesn't add up. Even back in 2015 (with 396 HP and 765 lb ft) the Duramax towed 19000 lbs up the Ike in just under 10 minutes. link
I don't think your statement on the Freightliner is correct. The cruise control was holding it at 50 MPH, most likely had a lot more anchor chain in the chain locker. RAM has this feature also when the EB is in auto. I do not use it because it does not brake until about 3-4 MPH above the CC speed.
I think the new GMs likely adjust the exhaust brake in auto as does the Ram and Ford. I believe in the test they had the GM exhaust brake turned to "on" which makes me think auto wasn't available in 2017. With the Freightliner Mr Truck said he didn"t have the cruise set. He said the engine brake could be set at 3 or 6 and he had it set at 6. So the Cummins was braking all it could without downshifting.